Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Stop the bull: Tourist complicity in animal cruelty


Thousands of tourists converge on Spain each year for the Running of the Bulls. Their participation gives the festival’s barbarity a stamp of approval, writes Susannah Waters.

Adrenaline propels him along the crowded street.

There is bedlam in the air: he can see it, feel it and smell it. He is trembling.

They menace him and scream from the sidelines. All around him, thousands of bodies are revelling in their dance with danger. Their roar stalks him along the cobbled path as others trample each other to dodge his mammoth frame. The white and red from their clothing blurs before his eyes. 

He keeps running.

Fiesta of ferocity

The streets have been hosed of rubbish, and businesses are now counting their cash bonanza. An exodus of thousands of tourists has poured out of the country. Many vow to return next year.

The media reports that at this year’s Running of the Bulls in Pamplona, Spain, 50 people were admitted to hospital with serious injuries. Some of these were life threatening, but there weren’t any fatalities. The last one occurred in 2009.

But casualties are absolutely instrumental to the fiesta; they are predestined. There must be deaths.

The spectacle of bulls tearing down narrow winding streets, sending hordes of hyped up and intoxicated people scrambling, is only one part of the picture. Those 48 bulls will not live beyond the pomp of the closing ceremony’s candlelight procession and fireworks display. They will die a protracted and torturous death in a stadium, with the shouts of a rowdy crowd baying for blood ringing in their ears.

And they will die at the behest of a festival which thrives on the participation of thousands of tourists to keep the annual event flourishing.

Blood on their hands

The Running of the Bulls has a very long history in Spain. But it is only in recent decades that the event has become a mecca for thousands of tourists from around the world.

Although the practice vastly predates its modern popularity with travellers, it is clear that the massive influx of tourists helps to keep the tradition alive. The injection of money into the local economy would be irresistible to Pamplona government authorities, presenting an immense challenge to those advocating for a ban of the event.

Tourist support of the Encierro helps to boost its image, and validates the concept of animal cruelty for the purposes of public voyeurism.

It also provides a formidable endorsement for bullfighting, an ethically void practice which has generated considerable debate within Spain in recent years. The large region of Catalonia banned bullfighting two years ago, owing in large part to significant public pressure. This provided hope that further bans were on the horizon, and demonstrated the viability of a phase-out of the practice.

It is clear that tourist participation in the Running of the Bulls equates to support of animal cruelty. 

In a recent article, British-Jamaican writer and poet Benjamin Zephaniah claimed that these tourists have blood on their hands. “Tourists who participate in the run or visit Pamplona simply to watch it, contribute to the carnage. Every shared tapa, every cerveza, every booked hotel room and balcony bolsters the killing. As long as the city makes money off the event, bulls will continue to suffer and die”, he wrote.

Zephaniah asserted that the tourists are “keen on their own enjoyment” but give “little thought to what the event actually means for the bulls.”

I have written before about how cheap tourist thrills can condemn animals to a life of misery. Tourist dollars can serve to trap animals in a cycle of abuse. Sadly, the value to the tourist can be trivial: the animal, often reduced to a photo prop, might feature on the tourist’s Facebook profile, where positive comments from friends help to condone their unethical choice. This holiday souvenir speaks volumes about the way in which we interact with and view animals.

It is true that travellers sometimes don’t question or recognise the exploitation of animals because the truth is often concealed from the public eye, as is the case with the phajaan ritual - the brutal training inflicted on elephants in preparation for work in tourism - in Thailand. Tourists are intentionally kept in the dark, as their ignorance is vital to the continued appropriation of elephants by the tourism industry.

However, the exploitation of bulls in Pamplona is not hidden from the public gaze. And it is not adequate to attribute it to “cultural context”. Cultural convention is never an excuse for the abuse of animals. Tourists should take responsibility to ensure that they don’t harm the local people, animals or environment in the visiting country.

There is nothing honourable, or brave, about supporting violence towards animals.

As the sun goes down

Finally, he stumbles through the gates of the stadium.

His fear is palpable; it is a demon coursing a path through his veins, pounding on his heart with no mercy, stealing his breath, and making him choke on the saliva which has formed in foam around his mouth. 

He hasn’t experienced any kindness in his life. His time snuggled against the warm body of his mother was brief - he was branded from birth, herded into line and his fate was sealed. Today will mark the felicitous culmination of a life lived in subservience to human will, to misguided and barbaric notions of entertainment.  

On this day, he will be attacked with a ruthless savagery. He will be speared repeatedly, he will be stabbed through the heart with a sword and he will fall – but he will keep trying to rise. He will fight hard for his miserable life to the very end.

He will draw his last breath.

Spectators will toss empty beer cans at him. And the stadium will erupt in celebration.  

--
Originally published July 2013 in Discordia online zine.